Homey & Dawg
Homey & Dawg Legal Associates
23 March 1999.
Our ref: dskag99/1
Dear sir or nigga, 'Sup. We write this letter for, on behalf of and reprazenting our client Mr Phat Renka. We are reliably informed by homies who (as you will understand) cannot be here named, that on five (5) occasions you have been witnessed in the act of dissing our client's mother****ing crew, thereby directly or indirectly incitin' yo niggas to verbal abuse and/or violence to same. Our client asks us to remind you that dissing is a serious offence in gangsta law and that, should you continue with, or even fail to retract, said statements, he will exercise his legal right to lay the smack down. We trust that this notice will not go unacknowledged and await yo urgent comments — biatch. Playas truly,
J Homey Sr,
Li'l G, O.G. & Masta G
24 April 1999. Dear Messrs Homey 'n' Dawg, First let it be the singular pleasure of da Tru Playas to bid y'all "whaddup homes". It has come to the attention of our client, Dr Skag, that certain accusations have been made concerning the conduct of his niggas in an alleged dissing of your client's mother****ing crew. Upon consultation with our esteemed nigga we have learned that it was in fact your client, the lowlife punk Mr Phat Renka, who started the fray, making a series of inflammatory allegations regarding the sexual proclivities of our client's momma. Under section 3, paragraph 2(a) of the 'Dealing with a Bitchass' code of 1989 our client was, in fact, well within his rights to pop a cap in each one o' yo lily asses and should be commended on his self-restraint. We at Tru Playas would have preferred not to raise the issue, bringing with it the uncomfortable notion of forcing each and every one of y'all to suck the ground. The matter having been raised however, we regret to inform you that our client has left us no choice but to pull a Glock on y'all. With respect (to da hood)
Oswald Grime.
|